Accumath

Toolchest · Datasheet

Seismic Tables — Accumath Toolchest

Dataset: accumath-seismic-tables.csv — 27 rows in one file, split by the table column:

Every value was transcribed from a published table on a page that was opened and read. Nothing was estimated, interpolated, averaged, or computed from a formula. Where no published value could be verified, the cell is blank.

Sources

wave_velocity — materials

wave_velocity — Earth layers

magnitude_energy

Wave types

Wave Type Particle motion Travels through Relative speed
P (primary) Body wave — compressional / longitudinal Parallel to the direction of propagation (push–pull) Solids, liquids, and gases Fastest; arrives first
S (secondary) Body wave — shear / transverse Perpendicular to the direction of propagation Solids only Slower than P; arrives second
Rayleigh Surface wave Retrograde elliptical motion in the vertical plane containing the propagation direction Along a free surface or boundary Slower than S in a uniform medium; dispersive in a layered Earth
Love Surface wave Horizontal, transverse to the direction of propagation (like an S wave confined to a surface layer) Requires a layered structure Dispersive; travels in the surface layer

Facts as stated in the University of Alberta Geophysics 224 notes (§C1): in a liquid the shear modulus is zero, so S waves cannot propagate in a liquid, while P waves can. That single fact drives the shadow-zone reasoning below and is why the vs column is blank for air and water in the CSV: fluids carry no shear waves. (In PREM the outer core's Vs is tabulated as exactly 0, and that published 0 is what the CSV records for the outer core.)

The S-wave shadow zone

Because the outer core is liquid, no S wave can cross it. Direct S waves from an earthquake are therefore not observed at stations whose ray paths would have to pass through the core — the S-wave shadow zone. P waves do enter the core, but they are strongly refracted at the core–mantle boundary (P velocity drops from ~13.7 km/s in the deepest mantle to ~8.1 km/s in the outer core, per the PREM rows in this dataset), which bends them away from an annular band of stations and produces the P-wave shadow zone as well. The absence of direct S waves beyond the shadow zone, together with the P-wave refraction pattern, is the standard published evidence that Earth's outer core is liquid — and the return of a finite Vs (3.50–3.67 km/s in PREM) in the inner core is part of the evidence that the inner core is solid.

Magnitude and energy

The Gutenberg–Richter energy relation (a published formula, stated here as a formula only — it was not evaluated to produce any CSV value):

log₁₀ E ≈ 1.5 M + 4.8, with E in joules.

USGS publishes a different relation on its "Earthquake Magnitude, Energy Release, and Shaking Intensity" page:

log E = 5.24 + 1.44 Mw

The two relations have different constants and are kept distinct here; neither was used to fill the CSV.

Step factors (published): each whole-number magnitude increase is a ×10 increase in measured amplitude and about a ×32 increase in energy released (USGS). USGS's The Severity of an Earthquake (General Interest Publication) tabulates the intermediate steps as well: a 0.5 magnitude increase is ×3.2 in ground motion and about ×5.5 in energy; 0.3 is ×2.0 and about ×3; 0.1 is ×1.3 and about ×1.4.

Why the CSV has whole magnitudes only — and a documented conflict

The requested 0.5-step span (4.0–9.5) could not be filled from a qualifying published table: no authoritative published table of joules and TNT equivalent at half-magnitude steps was found, and computing the half steps from the formula was prohibited by the dataset rules. The CSV therefore carries the whole-magnitude steps the chosen table actually publishes (4.0–9.0). The 9.5 step is likewise absent — the chosen table stops at 9.0.

Published TNT equivalences also conflict with each other by large factors, which is why only one table's basis is used in the CSV:

Source M4.0 equivalent
VolcanoDiscovery table (used in the CSV) 15 tons of TNT (with 6.3 × 10¹⁰ J)
USGS, "Earthquake and energy comparisons" chart (updated 2025) 56,000 kg of explosive equivalent (chart gives kg, whole magnitudes M2–M10, and does not state joules)
USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, "Volcano Watch" article ≈ 1,000 tons of TNT (it gives M1.0 ≈ 70 lb TNT, M2.0 ≈ 1 metric ton)

These figures rest on different energy conventions and are not interchangeable. They are recorded here so the conflict is visible; the CSV does not mix them.

Magnitude vs intensity

Magnitude and intensity are different quantities. Magnitude is a single number for the earthquake itself — the size of the source, tied to the energy released (this dataset's second table). Intensity describes the shaking and its effects at a particular place: one earthquake has one magnitude but many intensities, varying with distance from the epicentre, rupture direction, focal depth, and local ground conditions. The United States uses the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale for intensity — see the companion dataset accumath-mercalli-scale.csv. A magnitude table must never be read as an intensity prediction for a given town.

Caveats

Legal basis

Facts are not copyrightable (Feist v. Rural Telephone), and the values here are raw published facts restated in our own dataset with the source named on every row — no source's database file, table image, or expressive text was reproduced. USGS and GFZ material is government-published (US federal works are public domain under 17 U.S.C. § 105); the remaining values come from openly published university teaching material and scholarly journal articles, used as facts with attribution.